Featured Image
PHOTO/TED EYTAN. USED WITH PERMISSION (Source)

District of Columbia: A fiscal crisis revisited

March 12, 2025
  • Yesim Sayin

Yesterday, the House of Representatives voted on a Continuing Resolution to prevent a government shutdown. However, unlike in previous years, this resolution incorrectly treats Washington, D.C.’s locally funded budget—raised through local taxes—as part of the federal budget. As a result, the city will be forced to revert to its Fiscal Year 2024 budget. If this mistake is not corrected, D.C. will face $1.1 billion in spending cuts six months into the fiscal year. These cuts will not save the federal government a single cent but will undermine crime-reduction efforts, jeopardize school funding, and further destabilize the Metro system.

In 1997, a Republican-led Congress and a Democratic president enacted the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act—“The Revitalization Act”—to address D.C.’s financial crisis. The city, despite functioning as a state, locality, and school district, lacked the revenue base to sustain itself after nearly a century of federal control left it burdened with unfunded pension liabilities. Federal spending shifts had also triggered an economic downturn, pushing the city to bankruptcy in 1996. The Revitalization Act alleviated D.C.’s pension obligations, transferred parts of its criminal justice system to federal control, and introduced independent financial oversight, ensuring responsible fiscal management. Over the past 28 years, the results have been clear: population and revenue growth, infrastructure investments, improved public safety, expanded school choice that created a national model, strong bond ratings since 2003, and a financially stable city.

In the 1990s, Congress intervened to save Washington, D.C. from collapse. Today, a simple clerical error threatens to undo decades of progress. Cutting $1.1 billion from D.C.’s budget will not reduce the federal deficit, but it will gut essential services, making the city less safe, less functional, and less livable, and less welcoming to visitors. The 1997 Revitalization Act was a moment of responsible stewardship. Congress must uphold that legacy by fixing this mistake and allowing D.C. to manage its own budget.

Author

Yesim Sayin

Executive Director
D.C. Policy Center

Yesim Sayin is the founding Executive Director of the D.C. Policy Center.

With over twenty years of public policy experience in the District of Columbia, Dr. Sayin is recognized by policymakers, advocates and the media as a source of reliable, balanced analyses on the District’s economy and demography.  Yesim’s research interests include economic and fiscal policy, urban economic development, housing, and education. She is especially focused on how COVID-19 pandemic is changing regional and interregional economic interdependencies and what this means for urban policy. Her work is frequently covered in the media, including the Washington Post, the Washington Business Journal, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, WAMU, and the Washington City Paper, among others.

Before joining the D.C. Policy Center, Dr. Sayin worked at the District of Columbia Office of the Chief Financial Officer leading the team that scored the fiscal impact of all legislation the District considered. She frequently testified on high profile legislation and worked closely with the executive and Council staff to ensure that policymakers fully understand the fiscal implications of their proposed legislation. Yesim also has worked in the private sector, and consulted with international organization on a large portfolio of public finance topics.

Yesim holds a Ph.D. in economics from George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, and a bachelor’s degree in Political Science and International Relations from Bogazici University, located in Istanbul, Turkey.